<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2009-11-09:/</id><title>Plucker</title><link rel="self" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/"/><subtitle>A journey through time and space and old socks.&#13;
A swipe at political correctness and the Swiss.&#13;
An exquisite extra cover drive.&#13;
A quick burst of clawhammer pickin'.&#13;
An invitation to party (but do bring a bottle).&#13;
A case of deja vu (+ £4.99 p&amp;p).&#13;
No timewasters please.&#13;
</subtitle><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-09T19:14:53+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-03:/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911475</id><title>In response to:WHY ENGLAND WILL NOT WIN THE NEXT CRICKET WORLD CUP IN 2007</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911475"/><author><name>Daimon</name></author><published>2006-04-03T18:36:25+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-03T18:36:25+02:00</updated><content type="html">But the world cup is this year, innit. And yep, they won't winnit.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-03:/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c911460</id><title>In response to:The Menace of Smilies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c911460"/><author><name>Daimon</name></author><published>2006-04-03T18:33:54+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-03T18:33:54+02:00</updated><content type="html">Would you prefer a Carol instead?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Aarggh, therrr be smileys about there.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-03:/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911447</id><title>In response to:WHY ENGLAND WILL NOT WIN THE NEXT CRICKET WORLD CUP IN 2007</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911447"/><author><name>varshakale</name></author><published>2006-04-03T18:30:08+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-03T18:30:08+02:00</updated><content type="html">Why you are having Fredie. If he is retain as captain England has a chance and thee is a tradition that dark horse wins the world cup.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-03:/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911421</id><title>In response to:WHY ENGLAND WILL NOT WIN THE NEXT CRICKET WORLD CUP IN 2007</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/03/why_england_will_not_win_the_next_cricke~699542/#c911421"/><author><name>Znethru</name></author><published>2006-04-03T18:25:04+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-03T18:25:04+02:00</updated><content type="html">The clever money is on 5-2 to India in this current shambolic one-day series.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-02:/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c907180</id><title>In response to:The Menace of Smilies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c907180"/><author><name>lyndlj</name></author><published>2006-04-02T21:12:26+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-02T21:12:26+02:00</updated><content type="html">Wee-Meaning but Ultimately Stupid?&lt;br&gt;
You have no sense of fun then? Because thats all smileys are,fun. when you use the written word and are sat behind a screen sometimes words can be misconstrued,a wee little smiling face or a wink can help to alleviate that and to show that what you have said is in fun.&lt;br&gt;
You could have used a couple in your post;):))</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-02:/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c906141</id><title>In response to:The Menace of Smilies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c906141"/><author><name></name></author><published>2006-04-02T17:22:27+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-02T17:22:27+02:00</updated><content type="html">;) |-|</content></entry><entry><id>tag:plucker.blog.co.uk,2006-04-02:/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c906130</id><title>In response to:The Menace of Smilies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://plucker.blog.co.uk/2006/04/02/the_menace_of_smilies~696992/#c906130"/><author><name>eponymous</name></author><published>2006-04-02T17:19:41+02:00</published><updated>2006-04-02T17:19:41+02:00</updated><content type="html">Oh, that's a tad harsh on stupid people. Having said that - will delete all Smilies encountered. Forthwith.</content></entry></feed>
